Upload the artifact, set the guideflow
Drop in the reading, historical document, or case study. The simulator digests its themes, evidence, and ambiguities — then you define 3–5 realization nodes: the understandings your class should reach by the end, on their own. Eight students take their seats around the oval table, each with their own reading level and personality.
Always first to speak, never deeper than the surface. Thinks filling the silence is helping. Your spotlight is the counter.
Hyper-fixates on a minor detail or drifts into a personal story. One question kills it: “Where do you see that in the text?”
Understands everything. Says nothing — unless you make it safe, or a silence stretches long enough that she finally risks it.
Makes a bold, wrong claim and sells it hard. Resist correcting him yourself — the table has to do it with the text.
Restates whoever spoke last, sincerely, as a brand-new idea. Can you turn repetition into a real position?



